Skip to main content

Post content has been hidden

To unblock this content, please click here

T
Just Said Yes June 2020

Morning ceremony with evening reception?

Tiffany, on October 26, 2019 at 11:20 AM Posted in Planning 0 7

Hey all! I've enjoyed reading tips and opinions, so thought I could broach a subject that's been on my mind lately. My SO hasn't proposed yet, but I sense its coming so wanted to plan a little bit in my head of what I think I want. We will also have a shorter engagement as I will be attending medical school next summer, beginning late July.

Forewarning, my family cannot afford to pay for a full meal for 300+ guests, which is about how many will probably end up being invited, even if all don't come. To remedy this, I'm thinking about a morning ceremony around 10 am with a brunch afterwards, immediate family and close friends only. Hopefully around 100-125 total guests for the morning, that way we can pay for a nicer brunch meal since there will be fewer guests and I LOVE breakfast food!

However, with the little bit we have talked hypothetically about it, SO and I really want a dance included in the event, so I was thinking of having an evening reception around 7-7:30 pm that same day that would be more casual. We would invite everyone, including more than the immediate family and close friends that were invited to the morning ceremony for heavy appetizers and dancing.

With that being said, what can/can't I do at the reception if the same guests were not also invited to the morning ceremony? Can I have the cake cutting, speeches, first dance, etc at the reception even though it is not immediately following the ceremony and there will be a vast difference in the number of guests attending both events?

Thanks! Smiley heart

7 Comments

Latest activity by Pirate & 60s Bride, on October 26, 2019 at 3:43 PM
  • H
    Master July 2019
    Hannah ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    I've been to afternoon weddings where there is dancing and such. You don't necessarily have to separate the two. Your plan will probably end up costing you more because you are now paying for 2 receptions. The reception is the expensive part.

    Honestly, I would wait until the proposal and then have a conversation with your partner about what they also want. And you mentioned your family not being able to afford a 300+ person wedding. I would also not be counting on other people's money. The tradition of the bride's parents funding the whole wedding has mostly gone by the wayside. Unless they specifically told you they can contribute a certain amount to the wedding, I wouldn't count on it. Get engaged and then start planning the wedding you and your partner can afford on your own. If others offer to contribute, then you can figure that into the budget.
    • Reply
  • T
    Just Said Yes June 2020
    Tiffany ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment

    Hannah,

    Thanks for your input! I should have elaborated a little bit more- the ceremony in the morning wouldn't be followed by a reception, but would instead be followed by a time of fellowship/talking with the guests during and after the brunch. The one reception would be the casual one in the evening. With that being said... I'm still not totally sure how the whole thing would "end" so to speak, but like you mentioned, a lot of these are details that I need to discuss with my partner regardless! However its nice to know that dancing in the afternoon is possible with an afternoon reception, honestly I haven't been to many weddings so I wasn't sure!

    I totally understand this is a weird, non-conventional way of doing things, so I wanted to see what you ladies thought before any of it went too far.

    • Reply
  • Monique
    Master December 2019
    Monique ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    I would personally never invite people only to the reception part. Definitely make sure you are planning what you can afford. If that is 120 people and your guest list is 300 you should trim the guest list or give yourselves more time to afford having 300 people.
    • Reply
  • H
    Master July 2019
    Hannah ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment
    If it's a gathering after the ceremony, it's a reception. There is no 1 definition of a reception other than it is you hosting your guests after the ceremony. The idea is that you host something after the ceremony to thank them for attending. Whoever is at the ceremony should be invited to the event following it. I can almost guarantee that having these 2 receptions will cost more than just having 1.

    You mentioned a 300 person guest list and a 125 person guest list. It is also considered rude to have tiered weddings where people are not invited to all events. Inviting someone to the reception and not the ceremony implies they are important enough to give you a gift but not important enough to see you get married (there is a general exception if you have a private ceremony with just you two or only immediate family i.e. parents and siblings, in attendance). The other way implies that they are important enough to you to see you get married but not important enough to be fed. Do a search on tiered weddings on here. You will see a lot of posts about this.
    • Reply
  • Kelly
    Champion October 2018
    Kelly ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    I agree with others that this won’t save you money. Food is usually the most expensive part of a wedding and heavy appetizers usually end up costing as much as a meal. Depending on your budget you could do a cheaper meal like bbq/Italian/Mexican for everyone or you could cut down your guest list.
    • Reply
  • Shamaree
    Dedicated February 2020
    Shamaree ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    I’m not sure how that would work with so much time in between. Are you certain people will come back out? And that others will come for the reception if they weren’t invited to the ceremony? I guess it depends on the crowd.

    But I’m having a morning elopement, just my fiancé and I at sunrise. Nothing to follow at that time. The following year will be having a reception/anniversary party with family. This way we have ample time to make it happen.

    My best friend had a morning ceremony, brunch and then reception with dancing. Later that night we went out bar hopping for more dancing. So that’s definitely possible too.
    • Reply
  • Pirate & 60s Bride
    Legend March 2017
    Pirate & 60s Bride ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    Honestly, if you need to invite 300 guests I’d have an afternoon wedding (2 pm), invite them all and have a simple cake & punch reception immediately after. Easily & cheaply done in a church/temple then a hall for the reception on the same grounds. You can totally do first dances there.

    Or, on one day have your wedding & brunch reception for your 100 guests. Then the next day (or a month or so later) have a cake & punch reception at a non-meal time in a church/temple or community center hall.
    • Reply

You voted for . Add a comment 👇

×

Related articles

WeddingWire celebrates love ...and so does everyone on our site! Learn more

Groups

WeddingWire article topics