Necessary or Not: Champagne Toasts?

I personally hate champagne but do like the idea of having some sort of a toast.

Not necessary to provide champagne. Every wedding I've ever been to (except one) let guests toast with their own beverages.

Not necessary. We let them toast with whatever they got from the bar provided.

Eh not. I think a toast is nice but not necessarily champaigne. people can toast with their own drink.

We haven't settled on our venue yet, one includes the champagne toast for all guests and one does not. I'm very on the fence about this. I like the idea of the champagne toast but $600+ could be better spent elsewhere.

Not necessary. We're not even doing toasts at ours so.. there's that.

I agree with that, Future Mrs. H. A toast is nice, but could it be with, like, Sprite instead? Sparkling cider?

Then I guess the question is do you want to do a champagne toast, Nicole? Would your venue allow you to trade it from champagne to just sparkling wine or something like that?

Maggie, I do want a champagne toast yes

We had champagne for the head table, which I didn't even realize we had. So we had one, but I didn't care about it. The only time I like champagne is in my mimosas.

We will no a toast, with whatever our guest are drinking. A champagne toast is not necessary

I never thought of not having champagne or prosecco for the toasts. We're definitely having a couple toasts at ours, and I think we're doing prosecco toasts because FH loves prosecco. But I wouldn't be opposed to letting people toast with whatever they're drinking.

Are you going to be doing more than one toast, Abby?

Not necessary. We'll be toasting with whatever everyone is drinking!

We're having toasts, just not with champagne. We will let everyone chose what they would like to drink.

I do not think having champagne is necessary but toasting is something I look forward to doing at our wedding.