It’s basically a fact of life that most men in America are circumcised for non-religious reasons. But what does it really do? I've had some conversations with men who have claimed that the removal of the foreskin lessens sensitivity in men, making it harder to achieve pleasure. These men likened the removal of the foreskin to the removal of a female's clitoris.
Typically, the idea that removing the foreskin –thus making orgasm harder to reach – would be good for the woman (giving her more time to reach climax). But I’ve recently read an article that claims the exact opposite!
Statistically, a large percentage of women are shown to have 'Female arousal disorder’ – but there are being studies done that are now claiming that women don’t really have 'Female arousal disorder,’ but instead are having “a normal female response to coitus with a man with an iatrogenically [doctor caused] deficient penis."
