Skip to main content

Post content has been hidden

To unblock this content, please click here

M
Just Said Yes July 2024

The drama has started...

Mary, on April 25, 2023 at 3:05 PM

Posted in Family and Relationships 29

My daughter and her fiancé have just begun their wedding planning process and are facing a conflict with the location of the wedding and the size of guest list. The bride and groom do not live in either of the cities where their families live. My husband and I will be paying for the entire reception...

My daughter and her fiancé have just begun their wedding planning process and are facing a conflict with the location of the wedding and the size of guest list.

The bride and groom do not live in either of the cities where their families live. My husband and I will be paying for the entire reception and rehearsal dinner and have a healthy, but far from unlimited budget.

The groom is somewhat insistent that their wedding be in his home town, as many of his family and friends do not have the means to attend an out-of-town wedding. While many of our family and friends would be able to travel and would make the effort to do so, it is not an easy location to get to and an expensive town in which to stay. We feel strongly about the level of reception, as it is a reflection on us and all of our family and friends would travel to be there. The total guest list the bride and groom have compiled is larger than we are comfortable with (175 invites) given that we are paying for everything. It is heavy on their friends, which is great; the family/family friends list is about equal bride/groom. The bride has suggested having the wedding in the groom's home town and reducing our costs by choosing a lesser venue and eliminating/reducing other expenses; my husband and I are not ok with that solution.

We have suggested the following options: 1) reduce the number of guests to 120 expected attendees; a realistic compromise, but they feel they are not able to eliminate more than a few 2) wedding weekend that is immediate family and bridal party only so that no one is offended 3) a very casual wedding for those that are within close proximity - only the bride's immediate family would attend 4) have the wedding in the bride's home town and their guest list can remain as is, knowing there would be some that would be unable to attend. I REALLY want to ensure this wedding doesn't affect our relationship with our daughter and future son-in-law. There have already been tears. Help!

29 Comments

  • J
    Super March 2022
    JA ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment

    This very much sounds like you care more about impressing you family and friends than you care about your child and their spouse. You need to seriously reconsider where your priorities are. Based on your other comments as well the Bride and Groom have expressed their desires, offered to pay/contribute, and have offered compromises and YOU are being unreasonable. I hope you realize that this is their wedding and the only thing you are doing here is damaging your relationship with them

    • Reply
  • C
    CM ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment

    If the couple want the right to plan as they see fit then they need to agree to host and pay for their own wedding. That doesn't mean it's not wise to take the couple's wishes into account when possible. After all, it's their wedding day.

    OP can also choose to give the money to the couple to spend as they wish, with no strings attached. It would be a gift and the couple would then issue the invitations and be the main hosts. That's certainly a option, with the advantage that the affair is no longer a reflection of OP or her choices. It is not her obligation to do so, however there is a big picture to consider in wanting good will when this is all over. Is it worth it?

    Ultimately, the ball is in the couples's court. I don't see them turning down OP's offer. Reality is OP is going to have to take the potential consequences of whatever she decides to do into account. Etiquette is one thing, family relationships can be another. That said, the couple seems to think they are entitled, which is not the case, either.

    • Reply
  • M
    Savvy January 2022
    Mallory ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment

    The couple has said they are willing to pay - OP is putting them in an impossible position because she's refusing to take their money or provide the wedding that they actually want. She's manipulating it so they will have to be the ones to firmly cut her out of wedding planning completely or go along with what she wants. She ended her post saying "I REALLY want to ensure this wedding doesn't affect our relationship with our daughter and future son-in-law. There have already been tears." If there have already been tears, she doesn't really care how the wedding affects the relationship with daughter and FSIL as she's doubling down on everything here.

    • Reply
  • Jacks
    Rockstar November 2054
    Jacks ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    OP, your money and support are coming with strings attached. You're trying to make things go your way, and I can see why you're getting pushback.

    I can't see why the kids can't contribute and have the wedding that they want. That's unreasonable on your part.

    • Reply
  • C
    CM ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment

    OP only said they were willing to "contribute" not pay for the wedding. We don't know what that would amount to or whether it would cover the additional guests they want to invite.

    I agree that OP should be most concerned about damaging the relationship. What good is it to stand on ceremony in that case?

    • Reply
  • M
    Just Said Yes July 2024
    Mary ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    Thank you all for your input. Our financial contribution to our daughter's wedding will come with NO strings attached. We are very happy to do it for them. The bride and groom have already determined a number of details about the wedding THEY want and it will be their way, no matter what the location. We totally recognize that it is their wedding. If it is local for the groom's family, I just don't think it's at all unreasonable to ask that the list of the groom's 70+ family members (that will all likely attend, because it's local for them) be reduced if the groom's family is not contributing in any way. And... most of the tears have been mine.

    • Reply
  • Jacks
    Rockstar November 2054
    Jacks ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content

    "I just don't think it's at all unreasonable to ask that the list of the groom's 70+ family members (that will all likely attend, because it's local for them) be reduced if the groom's family is not contributing in any way."

    ^^that's an expectation that looks like a string to me^^

    If the couple wants to add money in so that they can host his whole family, I'm not sure why that's not reasonable.

    The groom's family is not obligated to contribute.

    • Reply
  • C
    CM ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    View Quoted Comment

    You're off base here. The guest list isn't meant to be pay to play. How many relatives are you inviting? The appropriate thing is to divide the guests list equally between bride and groom's family.

    What is reasonable is to make any necessary cuts beyond those who truly need and deserve to be there by category regardless of location. For example one might invite first cousins, but not second, cousins, but not their children etc.

    • Reply
  • R
    Rockstar
    Rosebud ·
    • Flag
    • Hide content
    Well it's very kind of you to offer to pay for the wedding. To limit drama I would give a definite figure of what you are willing to contribute and let them plan what they want with it, if what the plan goes over that number they can cover the rest. Have fun celebrating your daughter and and her partner!
    • Reply

You voted for . Add a comment 👇

×
WeddingWire celebrates love ...and so does everyone on our site! Learn more

Groups

WeddingWire article topics